Complications of Spine Surgery in "Super Obese" Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review with matched control. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indications and complications of spine surgery on super obese patients. METHODS: A retrospective review assessed super obese patients undergoing spine surgery at a level-1 trauma and spine referral center from 2012 to 2016. Outcomes were compared to age-matched controls with body mass index (BMI) <50 kg/m2. The control group was further subdivided into patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 (normal) and BMI between 30 and 50 kg/m2 (obese). RESULTS: Sixty-three super obese patients undergoing 86 surgeries were identified. Sixty patients (78 surgeries) were in the control group. Age and number of elective versus nonelective cases were not significantly different. Mean BMI of the super obese group was 55 kg/m2 (range 50-77 kg/m2) versus 29 kg/m2 in the controls (range 20-49 kg/m2). Fifty-two percent of surgeries were elective, and the most common indication was degenerative disease (39%). Compared with controls, super obese patients had a higher complication rate (30% [n = 19] vs 10% [N = 6], P = .0055) but similar 30-day mortality rate (5% vs 5%), a finding that was upheld when comparing super obese with each of the control group stratifications (BMI 30-50 and BMI <30 kg/m2). The most common complication among super obese patients was wound dehiscence/infection (n = 8, 13%); 2 patients' surgeries were aborted. Complication rates for elective surgery were 21% (n = 7) for super obese patients and 4% (n = 1) for controls (P = .121); complication rates for nonelective procedures were 40% (n = 12) and 14% (n = 5), respectively (P = .023). CONCLUSION: The complication rate of spine surgery in super obese patients (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) is significantly higher than other patients, particularly for nonelective cases.

Thecal Transection and Canal Fusion With Structural Allograft for Refractory Charcot Spinal Arthropathy: Technical Note.

Charcot spinal arthropathy presents significant surgical challenges, with large bony defects and limitations in fixation and reconstruction which are exacerbated in often numerous revision surgeries. These challenges make the development of additional salvage techniques useful. We report on a technique of thecal transection and canal fusion with structural allograft as a salvage technique for refractory cases of Charcot spinal arthropathy. We illustrate the technique with 4 procedures done in 3 patients, over a period of 10 years.

Robotic-Navigated Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Has Less Facet Joint Violation Than Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screws.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare robotic-versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement in thoracolumbar spine trauma with a focus on clinically acceptable pedicle screw accuracy and facet joint violation (FJV). METHODS: A retrospective chart review assessed 37 trauma patients undergoing percutaneous thoracic and/or lumbar fixation. Postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by authors blinded to surgical technique who assessed pedicle screw trajectory accuracy and FJV frequency. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent placement of 143 PPS with robotic assistance (robot group), compared with 20 patients receiving 149 PPS using fluoroscopy assistance (control group). Overall, the robot cohort demonstrated decreased FJV frequency of 2.8% versus 14.8% in controls (P = 0.0003). When further stratified by level of surgery (i.e., upper thoracic, lower thoracic, lumbar spine), the robot group had FJV frequencies of 0%, 3.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, compared with 17.7% (P = 0.0209), 14.3% (P = 0.0455), and 11.9% (P = 0.2340) in controls. The robot group had 84.6% clinically acceptable screw trajectories compared with 81.9% in controls (P = 0.6388). Within the upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions, the robot group had acceptable screw trajectories of 66.7%, 87.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, compared with 58.8% (P = 0.6261), 91.1% (P = 0.5655), and 97.6% (P = 0.2263) in controls. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in clinically acceptable screw trajectory accuracy between robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided PPS placement. However, the robot cohort demonstrated a statistically significantly decreased FJV overall and specifically within the thoracic spine region. Use of robotic technology may improve radiographic outcomes for a subset of patients or spine surgeries.

Effects of telemedicine triage on efficiency and cost-effectiveness in spinal care.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Ambulatory spine referral triage must be optimized to improve both quality of care and access to specialists. PURPOSE: To evaluate cost savings in an existing model of telemedicine/electronic-triage for ambulatory spine referrals. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review. Institutional spine center. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients/referrals made to the institutional spine center of a tertiary medical center from 2011 to 2014 were included in the data analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost savings and efficiency was evaluated based upon intake to appointment time, rate of referral to surgeons versus nonoperative providers, additional testing required, and extrapolated cost savings based on estimated avoidance of unnecessary office visits and travel. METHODS: All ambulatory spine referrals electronically triaged (E-triaged) from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed. The E-triage database was mined for data from intake until triage completion. Hospital electronic medical record system was mined for data on initial clinic visit, tests ordered, follow-up appointments, and presence of surgical encounters. Financial savings from avoiding unnecessary visits were estimated. RESULTS: There were 16,174 records created from 2011 to 2014, of which 10,832 were E-triaged by spine surgeons. E-triage generated 3,718 nonoperative provider visits within our healthcare system. The "saved" surgical consult that was avoided resulted in total estimated savings of $793,835 to the patient population; 4,446 patients were deemed surgical and were offered appointments with a spine surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate triage of ambulatory spine referrals improves access and quality of care. E-triage resulted in $800,000 cost savings. Further studies are required to fully evaluate the effects of an E-triage system on ambulatory spinal care.

Hangman's Fracture.

STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVE: A review and update of the treatment of Hangman's fractures including the indications for both nonoperative and operative treatment of typical and atypical fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture pattern of the C2 vertebrae following odontoid fractures. Many of the stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIa and III fractures require surgical stabilization. METHODS: A review of the literature. RESULTS: The clinical and radiographic outcomes of the treatment of Hangman's fractures lend a good overall prognosis when the correct diagnosis is made. The nonoperative treatment of stable type I and II fractures with external immobilization leads to excellent long-term outcomes as does the operative treatment of the unstable type IIa and III fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Hangman's fractures can be classified as stable (type I and most II) or unstable (type IIa and III) and the optimal treatment depends upon this distinction. Stable injuries do well with rigid immobilization and rarely require operative intervention. In contrast, unstable injuries do poorly if treated nonoperatively but do well with surgical intervention. When treating atypical Hangman's variants, great vigilance and close clinical observation is paramount if nonoperative treatment is indicated given the potential for neurological compression in this fracture pattern. Properly identifying and treating these injuries represents an opportunity for the spine surgeon to optimize patient outcomes.

Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

The obese population is particularly challenging to the spine surgeon in all phases of care. A narrative literature review was performed to review difficulties in spine surgery on the obese patient population and techniques for mitigation. We specifically aimed to assess several topics with regard to this population: patient selection and preoperative care; intraoperative and surgical techniques; and postoperative care, outcomes, and complications. The literature review demonstrated that obese patients are at increased surgical risk with spine surgery due to a variety of factors at all stages of intervention. Preoperatively, obese patients have worse outcomes with physical therapy and present technical difficulties for injections. Transport to a hospital, imaging, resuscitation, and intubation are all challenged by increased body habitus. Intraoperatively, obese patients have increased operative times, blood loss, surgical site infections, and nerve palsies. Patient positioning and intraoperative imaging may be limited. Surgery itself may be technically challenging due to body habitus and minimally invasive techniques are becoming more prevalent in this population. Postoperatively, several studies demonstrate that obese patients have inferior outcomes compared with nonobese counterparts. Patient selection is a key for elective interventions, and appropriate infrastructure aids in the ultimate outcomes for both elective and nonelective surgical treatments. Overall, obese patients present several challenges to the spine surgeon, and certain precautions can be undertaken preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively to mitigate the associated risks to optimize outcomes.

The Effects of Perioperative Corticosteroids on Dysphagia Following Surgical Procedures Involving the Anterior Cervical Spine: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is one of the most common complications of surgical procedures in the anterior cervical spine, and can persist up to 2 years postoperatively. Corticosteroids are relatively safe and inexpensive for treating various inflammatory conditions. Perioperative corticosteroid administration for anterior cervical spine procedures may effectively minimize postoperative dysphagia, potentially leading to better outcomes, decreased readmission rates, and improved patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of perioperative corticosteroids in decreasing the severity and duration of dysphagia following single-level and multilevel anterior cervical spine procedures. METHODS: Seventy-four patients undergoing elective anterior cervical surgical procedures for degenerative conditions were recruited. Patients with prior cervical procedures; with a diagnosis of fracture, malignancy, or infection; or requiring combined anterior-posterior procedures were excluded. Patients were randomized to perioperative intravenous dexamethasone or saline solution. Doses were administered before incision and at 8 and 16 hours postoperatively. Investigators and patients were blinded to the treatment throughout the study. Dysphagia outcomes were assessed with use of the Bazaz dysphagia scale and the Dysphagia Short Questionnaire (DSQ) at 1 day, 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed comparing means and standard deviations; significance was set at p < 0.05. Clinical outcomes were measured with use of the Quality of Life-12 and Neck Disability Index. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis. There were 49 anterior cervical discectomies and fusions, 8 corpectomies, 1 hybrid procedure (corpectomy and adjacent discectomy), and 6 single-level arthroplasties. Patients who received corticosteroids had significantly better dysphagia scores on both the Bazaz scale and DSQ at most time points up to 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). On subgroup analysis, patients with multilevel (≥2-level) fusion benefited significantly from corticosteroids on both scales, whereas those with single-level procedures did not. There were no short-term wound complications or infections, and length of stay and fusion rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative administration of corticosteroids can reduce dysphagia symptoms following multilevel anterior cervical procedures. Benefit was noted immediately and up to 6 months postoperatively. There was no significant effect on short-term wound-healing, infection rates, length of stay, or fusion rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Secondary Discitis Masquerading as Treatment Failure of Primary Discitis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral osteomyelitis often presents with localized back pain at the site of infection and elevated inflammatory markers. It can generally be treated conservatively with antibiotics targeted at the causative microorganism, but failure of medical treatment often necessitates surgical debridement. There are no reports in the literature that describe a secondary infection masquerading as treatment failure of the primary infection. METHODS: We present a case of a 29-year-old male with a history of intravenous drug abuse who was treated with antibiotics for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus T6-7 discitis/osteomyelitis. The patient later returned with worsened back pain and was initially thought to have experienced failure of medical therapy, but instead was found to have a secondary discitis at a different level, with biopsy-proven different microorganism (Enterobacter cloacae). CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the possibility of secondary discitis masquerading as treatment failure of the primary discitis. Repeat imaging and biopsy of the new lesion avoided a surgical procedure in this patient.

Predictive factors of survival in a surgical series of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression and complete external validation of 8 multivariate models of survival in a prospective North American multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to identify preoperative predictors of survival in surgically treated patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), to examine how these predictors are related to 8 prognostic models, and to perform the first full external validation of these models in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement. METHODS: One hundred forty-two surgically treated patients with MESCC were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter North American cohort study and were followed for 12 months or until death. Cox regression was used. Noncollinear predictors with < 10% missing data, with ≥ 10 events per stratum, and with P < .05 in a univariate analysis were tested through a backward stepwise selection. For the original and revised Tokuhashi prognostic scoring systems (PSSs), Tomita PSS, modified Bauer PSS, van der Linden PSS, Bartels model, Oswestry Spinal Risk Index, and Bollen PSS, this study examined calibration graphically, discrimination with Harrell c-statistics, and survival stratified by risk groups with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: The following were significant in the univariate analysis: type of primary tumor, sex, organ metastasis, body mass index, preoperative radiotherapy to MESCC, physical component (PC) of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2), and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. Breast, prostate and thyroid primary tumor (HR: 2.9; P =.0005), presence of organ metastasis (hazard ratio (HR): 2.0; P = .005) and SF-36v2 PC (HR: 0.95; P < .0001) were associated with survival in multivariable analysis. Predicted prognoses poorly matched observed values on calibration plots; Bartels model calibration slope was 0.45. Bollen PSS (0.61; 95% CI: 0.58-0.64) and Bartels model (0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.71) had the lowest and highest c-statistics, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The primary tumor type (breast, prostate, or thyroid), an absence of organ metastasis, and a lower degree of physical disability are preoperative predictors of longer survival for surgical MESCC patients. These results are in keeping with current models. This full external validation of 8 prognostic PSSs or model of survival in surgical MESCC patients has revealed that calibration is poor, especially for long-term survivors, whereas discrimination is possibly helpful.

Return to Play after Cervical Spine Injuries: A Consensus of Opinion.

Study Design Survey. Objective Sports-related spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a growing proportion of total SCIs but lacks evidence or guidelines to guide clinical decision-making on return to play (RTP). Our objective is to offer the treating physician a consensus analysis of expert opinion regarding RTP that can be incorporated with the unique factors of a case for clinical decision-making. Methods Ten common clinical scenarios involving neurapraxia and stenosis, atlantoaxial injury, subaxial injury, and general cervical spine injury were presented to 25 spine surgeons from level 1 trauma centers for whom spine trauma is a significant component of their practice. We evaluated responses to questions about patient RTP, level of contact, imaging required for a clinical decision, and time to return for each scenario. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Evaluation of the surgeons' responses to these cases showed significant consensus regarding return to high-contact sports in cases of cervical cord neurapraxia without symptoms or stenosis, surgically repaired herniated disks, and nonoperatively healed C1 ring or C2 hangman's fractures. Greater variability was found in recommendations for patients showing persistent clinical symptomatology. Conclusion This survey suggests a consensus among surgeons for allowing patients with relatively normal imaging and resolution of symptoms to return to high-contact activities; however, patients with cervical stenosis or clinical symptoms continue to be a challenge for management. This survey may serve as a basis for future clinical trials and consensus guidelines.

A Comparison of Open and Percutaneous Techniques in the Operative Fixation of Spinal Fractures Associated with Ankylosing Spinal Disorders.

BACKGROUND: The operative care of patients with ankylosing spinal conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) after a spine fracture is not well represented in the literature. This work seeks to determine the effect of minimally invasive techniques on patients with spinal fractures and ankylosing spinal conditions through a retrospective case-control analysis. METHODS: The operative logs from 1996-2013 of seven fellowship-trained spine surgeons from two academic, Level I trauma centers were reviewed for cases of operatively treated thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with an ankylosing spinal condition and a spinal fracture were identified. The minimally invasive group demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in estimated blood loss, operative time, and need for transfusion when compared to either the hybrid or open group. There was no difference between the three subgroups in overall hospital stay or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ankylosing spinal conditions present unique challenges for operative fixation of spinal fractures. Minimally invasive techniques for internal fixation offer less blood loss, operative time, and need for transfusion compared to traditional techniques; however, no difference in hospital stay or mortality was reflected in this series of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ankylosing spinal disorders are increasingly common in an aging population.

Improvement of Segmental Lordosis in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Two Techniques.

Study Design Retrospective review. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the radiographic impact of a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus a cantilever TLIF technique on segmental lordosis, segmental coronal alignment, and disk height. Methods A retrospective review was done of all patients undergoing TLIF procedures from 2006 to 2011 by three spine surgeons. Traditional TLIF versus cantilever TLIF results were compared, and radiographic outcomes were assessed. Results One hundred one patients were included in the study. Patients undergoing the cantilever TLIF procedure had a significantly greater change in segmental lordosis and disk height compared with those who underwent the traditional procedure (p > 0.0001). Conclusions The cantilever TLIF technique can lead to greater change in segmental lordosis based upon radiographic outcomes.

Fracture of fusion mass after hardware removal in patients with high sagittal imbalance.

OBJECT: As spinal fusions become more common and more complex, so do the sequelae of these procedures, some of which remain poorly understood. The authors report on a series of patients who underwent removal of hardware after CT-proven solid fusion, confirmed by intraoperative findings. These patients later developed a spontaneous fracture of the fusion mass that was not associated with trauma. A series of such patients has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: An unfunded, retrospective review of the surgical logs of 3 fellowship-trained spine surgeons yielded 7 patients who suffered a fracture of a fusion mass after hardware removal. Adult patients from the West Virginia University Department of Orthopaedics who underwent hardware removal in the setting of adjacent-segment disease (ASD), and subsequently experienced fracture of the fusion mass through the uninstrumented segment, were studied. The medical records and radiological studies of these patients were examined for patient demographics and comorbidities, initial indication for surgery, total number of surgeries, timeline of fracture occurrence, risk factors for fracture, as well as sagittal imbalance. RESULTS: All 7 patients underwent hardware removal in conjunction with an extension of fusion for ASD. All had CT-proven solid fusion of their previously fused segments, which was confirmed intraoperatively. All patients had previously undergone multiple operations for a variety of indications, 4 patients were smokers, and 3 patients had osteoporosis. Spontaneous fracture of the fusion mass occurred in all patients and was not due to trauma. These fractures occurred 4 months to 4 years after hardware removal. All patients had significant sagittal imbalance of 13-15 cm. The fracture level was L-5 in 6 of the 7 patients, which was the first uninstrumented level caudal to the newly placed hardware in all 6 of these patients. Six patients underwent surgery due to this fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a case series of 7 patients who underwent surgery for ASD after a remote fusion. These patients later developed a fracture of the fusion mass after hardware removal from their previously successfully fused segment. All patients had a high sagittal imbalance and had previously undergone multiple spinal operations. The development of a spontaneous fracture of the fusion mass may be related to sagittal imbalance. Consideration should be given to reimplanting hardware for these patients, even across good fusions, to prevent spontaneous fracture of these areas if the sagittal imbalance is not corrected.

Effect of Head Position on Intraocular Pressure During Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Randomized, Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic optic neuropathy resulting in visual loss is a rare but devastating complication of spine surgery. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) results in decreased perfusion and possibly ischemic optic neuropathy. We performed a randomized, prospective trial to evaluate the effect of head positioning on IOP during lumbar spine fusion. METHODS: The study included fifty-two patients treated at one institution. Inclusion criteria were a lumbar spine fusion and an age of eighteen to eighty years. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of tumor, infection, or traumatic injury or a history of eye disease, ocular surgery, cervical spine surgery, chronic neck pain, or cervical stenosis. The control group underwent the surgery with the head in neutral and the face parallel to the level operating room table whereas, in the experimental group, the neck was extended so that the face had a 10° angle of inclination in relation to the table. IOP measurements were recorded along with the corresponding blood pressure and PCO2 values at the same time points. The primary outcome measure was the change in intraocular pressure (ΔIOP, defined as the maximum IOP minus the initial IOP). RESULTS: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for categorical risk factors, and regression analysis was used for continuous risk factors. The mean ΔIOP, corrected for duration of surgery, was significantly (p = 0.0074) lower in the group treated with the head elevated than it was in the group treated with the head in neutral (difference between the two groups, 4.53 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 7.79 mm Hg]). No patient sustained visual loss or any cervical-spine-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Head elevation for adult lumbar spine fusion performed with the patient prone resulted in significantly lower IOP measurements than those seen when the operation was done with the patient's head in neutral. As lower IOP correlates with increased optic nerve perfusion, this intervention could mitigate the risk of perioperative blindness after spine surgery done with the patient prone.

Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Lumbar Fusion: The Effectiveness and Safety Compared with Local Bone Graft, and Graft Site Morbidity Comparing a Single-Incision Midline Approach with a Two-Incision Traditional Approach.

Study Design Systematic review. Clinical Questions (1) Is autologous local bone (LB) graft as safe and effective as iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in lumbar spine fusion? (2) In lumbar fusion using ICBG, does a single-incision midline approach reduce postoperative iliac crest pain compared with a two-incision traditional approach? Methods Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched up to October 2014 to identify studies reporting the comparative efficacy and safety of ICBG versus LB graft or comparing ICBG harvest site for use in lumbar spine surgery. Studies including allograft, synthetic bone, or growth factors in addition to ICBG and those with less than 80% of patients with degenerative disease in the lumbar spine were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of the evidence quality using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results Seven studies were identified as using ICBG fusion for degenerative disease in the lumbar spine. There were no differences in the fusion, leg pain, low back pain, or functional outcomes between patients receiving LB versus ICBG. There was a higher incidence of donor site pain and sensory loss in patients receiving ICBG, with no donor site complications attributed to LB. Compared with patients with the graft harvested through the two-incision traditional approach, patients with the graft harvested through the single-incision midline approach had lower mean pain scores over the iliac crest, with a higher proportion reporting no iliac crest tenderness. In patients with ICBG harvested through the single-incision midline approach on either the right or the left side of the ilium, only 36% of the patients were able to correctly identify the side when asked whether they knew which iliac crest was harvested. Only 19% of the patients with ICBG harvested through the single-incision midline approach on either the right or the left side of the ilium reported pain that was concordant with the side that was actually harvested. Conclusions LB is as safe and efficacious as ICBG for instrumented fusion in the lumbar spine to treat degenerative disease. When ICBG is used, graft harvest through the single-incision midline approach reduces postoperative iliac crest pain compared with a two-incision approach.

Effect of serum nicotine level on posterior spinal fusion in an in vivo rabbit model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cigarette smoking has a deleterious effect on spinal fusion. Although some studies have implied that nicotine is primarily responsible for poor fusion outcomes, other studies suggest that nicotine may actually stimulate bone growth. Hence, there may be a dose-dependent effect of nicotine on posterior spinal fusion outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if such a relationship could be shown in an in vivo rabbit model. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective in vivo animal study. METHODS: Twenty-four adult male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into four groups. All groups received a single-level posterolateral, intertransverse process fusion at L5-L6 with autologous iliac crest bone. One group served as controls and only underwent the spine fusion surgery. Three groups received 5.25-, 10.5-, and 21-mg nicotine patches, respectively, for 5 weeks. Serum nicotine levels were recorded for each group. All animals were euthanized 5 weeks postoperatively, and spinal fusions were evaluated radiographically, by manual palpation, and biomechanically. Statistical analysis evaluated the dose response effect of outcomes variables and nicotine dosage. This study was supported by a portion of a $100,000 grant from the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation. Author financial disclosures were completed in accordance with the journal's guidelines; there were no conflicts of interests disclosed that would have led to bias in this work. RESULTS: The average serum levels of nicotine from the different patches were 7.8±1.9 ng/mL for the 5.25-mg patch group; 99.7±17.7 ng/mL for the 10.5-mg patch group; and 149.1±24.6 ng/mL for the 21-mg patch group. The doses positively correlated with serum concentrations of nicotine (correlation coefficient=0.8410, p<.001). The 5.25-mg group provided the best fusion rate, trabeculation, and stiffness. On the basis of the palpation tests, the fusion rates were control (50%), 5.25 mg (80%), 10.5 mg (50%), and 21 mg (42.8%). Radiographic assessment of trabeculation and bone incorporation and biomechanical analysis of bending stiffness ratio were also greatest in the 5.25-mg group. Radiographic evaluation showed a significant (p=.0446) quadratic effect of nicotine dose on spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of nicotine on spinal fusion are complex, may be dose dependent, and may not always be detrimental. The uniformly negative effects of smoking reported in patients undergoing spinal fusion may possibly be attributed to the other components of cigarette smoke.

Does CT Angiography Matter for Patients with Cervical Spine Injuries?

BACKGROUND: Cervical injury can be associated with vertebral artery injury. This study was performed to determine the impact of computed tomography (CT) angiography of the head and neck on planning treatment of cervical spine fracture, if these tests were ordered appropriately, and to estimate cost and associated exposure to radiation and contrast medium. METHODS: This retrospective review included all patients who underwent CT of the cervical spine and CT angiography of the head and neck from January 2010 to August 2011 at one institution. Patients were divided into those with and those without cervical spine fracture seen on CT of the cervical spine. We determined if the CT angiography of the head and neck was positive for vascular injury in the patients with a cervical fracture. Vascular injury treatment and alterations in surgical fracture treatment due to positive CT angiography of the head and neck were recorded. A scan was deemed appropriate if it had been ordered per established institutional protocol. RESULTS: Of the 381 patients who underwent CT angiography of the head and neck, 126 had a cervical injury. Sixteen of the CT angiography studies were appropriately ordered for non-spinal indications, and twenty-three were inappropriately ordered. The CT angiography was positive for one patient for whom the imaging was off protocol and one for whom the indication was non-spinal. Nineteen patients had positive CT angiography of the head and neck; no patient underwent surgical intervention for a vascular lesion. Eleven patients underwent surgical intervention for a cervical fracture; the operative plan was changed because of vascular injury in one case. The CT angiography was positive for eleven of forty-eight patients who had sustained a C2 fracture; this group accounted for eleven of the nineteen positive CT angiography studies. Noncontiguous injuries occurred in nineteen patients; three had positive CT angiography of the head and neck. The approximate charge for the CT angiography was $3925, radiation exposure was approximately 4000 mGy/cm, and contrast-medium load was approximately 100 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Positive CT angiography of the head and neck rarely altered surgical treatment of cervical spine injuries. This study supports the findings in the literature that C1-C3 spine injuries have an increased association with vertebral artery injury. CT angiography of the head and neck ordered off protocol had a low likelihood of being positive. Strict adherence to protocols for CT angiography of the head and neck can reduce costs and decrease unnecessary exposure to radiation and contrast medium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Low lumbar fractures: does thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score work?

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) system is effective in evaluating low lumbar injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The TLICS classification has been used by spine traumatologists since its introduction in 2006. The classification is predictable and consistent when dealing with thoracolumbar injuries. It is not known if the classification is effective in dealing with low lumbar injuries that tend to behave differently than thoracolumbar injuries. TLICS is yet to be clinically validated. There are no reports of its use for low lumbar injuries alone. METHODS: For this case series, 20 low lumbar injuries were graded using the TLICS system by 15 fellowship-trained orthopedic spine and neurosurgeons. Interobserver reliability was graded using κ values. The reviewers were also asked 4 clinical questions regarding diagnosis and treatment of these injuries. RESULTS: When using the TLICS system for low lumbar injuries, there was "fair" reliability among the reviewers. Concerning the final TLICS score, there was 28% agreement with a κ of 0.245. Concerning fracture morphology, there was 58% agreement with a κ value of 0.394. When evaluating the posterior ligamentous complex, there was 56% agreement with a κ value of 0.328. The reviewers did agree consistently on determining the patient's neurological status. The data showed 94% agreement with a κ of 0.818. When looking at L3 injuries by themselves, the reliability of TLICS improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The authors think that there are factors involved in treating low lumbar injuries that are not inclusive to the TLICS system. Overall, there was only "fair" reliability for low lumbar injuries. The maintenance of lordosis and global sagittal alignment is paramount when dealing with low lumbar injuries and not considered in TLICS. L3 injuries tend to behave like thoracolumbar injuries but there is a wide variation in classification between L4-L5 and thoracolumbar injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.